REVIEW ARTICLE

Obstetrics and Gynecology

doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2023-25-3-380-389
INDUCTION OF LABOR IN PRE-ECLAMPTIC WOMEN

M.Ya. Kamilova1, B.K. Koimdodova2, F.R. Ishan-Khodzhaeva1, M. Kiyomiddinzoda1

1Obstetrics Department, Tajik Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 2, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan

Objective: The article presents a literature review on the current possibilities of induction of labor (IOL) in severe preeclampsia (SPE). Delivery is the only treatment for preeclampsia (PE), a serious pregnancy complication. In women with SPE, better maternal and perinatal outcomes are associated with vaginal delivery. The exceptions are cases where there are obstetric indications for cesarean section (CS) or the need for urgent delivery due to complications of PE. The optimal IOL methods for women with SPE, especially when early delivery is necessary, are still not established. In this regard, studies on the most appropriate IOL methods for women with PE are crucial. A literature data search was conducted through Elibrary, Cyberleninka, and PubMed to obtain relevant information from the abovementioned databases.

Keywords: Pregnancy, severe preeclampsia, labor induction, methods of labor induction..

Download file:


References
  1. Stepanova RN. Epidemiologiya preeklampsii: prognoz i profilaktika [Epidemiology of preeclampsia: Prognosis and prevention]. Oryol, RF: Orlovskiy gosudarstvennyy universitet imeni I.S. Turgeneva; 2014. 167 p.
  2. Narkhede AM, Karnad DR. Preeclampsia and related problems. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021;25 3):S261-S266. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24032
  3. Simanov IV. Osobennosti techeniya rodov pri preeklampsii razlichnoy stepeni na sovremennom etape [Features of the course of childbirth with preeclampsia of varying degrees at the present stage]. Nauchnye rezul’taty biomeditsinskikh issledovaniy. 2020;6(2):289-97. https://doi.org/10.18413/2658-6533-2020-6- 2-0-12
  4. Vasiliev SA, Peresada OA, Kurlovich IV, Vashilina TP, Semenchuk VA, Viktor SA. Induktsiya rodov: tendentsii v mirovoy praktike [Induction of labor: Trends in world practice]. Sovremennye dostizheniya v belorusskoy i mirovoy nauke i praktike. 2021;5:9-14
  5. WHO recommendations: Policy of interventionist versus expectant management of severe pre-eclampsia before term. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. PMID: 30629390.
  6. Chappell LC. Planned early delivery or expectant management for late preterm pre-eclampsia (PHOENIX): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10204):1181-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31963-4
  7. Bektemir ZB, Ryskeldieva VT. Preeklampsiya tyazhyoloy stepeni: vaginal’nye rody ili kesarevo sechenie? [Severe preeclampsia: Vaginal delivery or caesarean section?]. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal prikladnykh i fundamental’nykh issledovaniy. 2020;1:16-22. https://doi.org/10.17513/mjpfi.12990
  8. Cluver C, Novikova N, Koopmans CM, West HM. Planned early delivery versus expectant management for hypertensive disorders from 34 weeks gestation to term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 15;1(1):CD009273. https://doi. org/10.1002/14651858.CD009273.pub2
  9. Carlson N, Ellis J, Page K, Dunn Amore A, Phillippi J. Review of evidence-based methods for successful labor induction. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2021;66(4):459-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13238
  10. Ramya Mohana VA, Dorairajan G. Outcome of induction of labor with Foley's catheter in women with previous one cesarean section with unfavorable cervix: An experience from a tertiary care institute in South India. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022;72(1):26-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13224-021-01459-0
  11. Gonsalves H, Al-Riyami N, Al-Dughaishi T, Gowri V, Al-Azri M, Salahuddin A. Use of intracervical Foley catheter for induction of labour in cases of previous caesarean section: Experience of a single tertiary centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2016;16(4):e445-e450. https://doi.org/10.18295/ squmj.2016.16.04.007
  12. Baev OR, Rumyantseva VP. Mifepriston v preinduktsii i induktsii rodov [Mifepristone in preinduction and induction of labor]. Farmateka. 2011;13:75-9
  13. Ahidzhak AN, Rusina KA, Tkachenko EI. Prakticheskiy analiz: preinduktsiya rodov preparatom mifepriston – ishody [Practical analysis: Pre-induction of labor with mifepristone – outcomes]. Nauchnyy vestnik zdravookhraneniya Kubani. 2022;2:1-6.
  14. Sheibani L, Wing DA. A safety review of medications used for labour induction. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17(2):161-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2 018.1404573
  15. Radzinskiy VE, Doronina OK, Startseva NM, Isenova SI, Isina GM, Bishchekova BN. Induktsiya rodov Mifepristonom i intratservikal'nym ballonnym kateterom [Induction of labor with mifepristone and intracervical balloon catheter]. Vestnik Kazakhskogo natsional'nogo meditsinskogo universiteta. 2022;2:103-15. https://doi.org/10.53065/kaznmu.2022.99.94.007
  16. Wing DA, Ortiz-Omphroy G, Paul RH. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177(3):612-8. https://doi. org/10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70154-6
  17. Mendez-Figueroa H, Bicocca MJ, Gupta M, Wagner SM, Chauhan SP. Labor induction with prostaglandin E1 versus E2: A comparison of outcomes. J Perinatol. 2021;41(4):726-35. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-020-00888-5
  18. Karadağ C, Esin S, Tohma YA, Yalvaç ES, Başar T, Karadağ B. Repeated dose of prostaglandin E2 vaginal insert when the first dose fails. Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;18(1):50-5. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.galenos.2021.34119
  19. Sherman AI. The role of prostaglandins in obstetrics/gynecology. Spec Top Endocrinol Metab. 1984;6:141-61.
  20. Kuhl A, Lampé L, Nagy G, Mocsáry P, Papp Z. Preparation of the immature cervix with prostaglandin F2 alpha prior to the induction of labor. Orv Hetil. 1984;125(45):2729-32.
  21. Rahimi M, Haghighi L, Baradaran HR, Azami M, Larijani SS, Kazemzadeh P, Moradi Y. Comparison of the effect of oral and vaginal misoprostol on labor induction: Updating a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies. Eur J Med Res. 2023;28(1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-023- 01007-8
  22. Baev OR, Gusar VA, Gaydarova AR, Edilberg IV. Primenenie vaginal'noy terapevticheskoy sistemy s prostaglandinom dlya induktsii rodov [Use of a vaginal prostaglandin therapeutic system for labor induction]. Meditsinskiy sovet. 2022;16(16):84-91. https://doi.org/10.21518/2079-701X-2022-16-16-84-91
  23. Bolla D, Weissleder SV, Radan AP, Gasparri ML, Raio L, Muller M, Surbek D. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: A cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):149. https:// doi.org/ 10.1186/s12884-018-1788-z
  24. Khodzhaeva DN, Ayupova DA, Madolimova NKh. Vybor taktiki rodorazresheniya pri tyazhyoloy preeklampsii [The choice of tactics of delivery in severe preeclampsia]. Re-health Journal. 2021;2(10):10-6.
  25. Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, et al. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016;123(3):346-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13456
  26. Ryskeldieva VT, Bektemir KZ. Metody induktsii rodov v sovremennom akusherstve i vozmozhnosti ikh primeneniya pri preeklampsii (obzor literatury) [Methods of labor induction in modern obstetrics and the possibility of their use in preeclampsia (literature review)]. Nauka, novye tekhnologii i innovatsii Kyrgyzstana. 2018;8:36-9
  27. Penfield CA, Wing DA. Labor Induction Techniques: Which Is the Best? Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2017;44(4):567-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ogc.2017.08.011
  28. Hawkins JS, Wing DA. Current pharmacotherapy options for labor induction. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2012;13(14):2005-14. https://doi.org/10.1517/14 656566.2012.722622
  29. Sharkwy IAE, Noureldin EH, Mohamed EAE, Shazly SA. Sequential versus concurrent use of vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018;68(5):408-13. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1059-3.
  30. Tarimo CS, Mahande MJ, Obure J. Prevalence and risk factors for caesarean delivery following labor induction at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania: A retrospective cohort study (2000-2015). BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-020-02861-8
  31. Rankin K, Chodankar R, Raymond K, Bhaskar S. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;235:93-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ejogrb.2018.07.025
  32. Lee DS, Tandel MD, Kwan L, Francoeur AA, Duong HL, Negi M. Favorable Simplified Bishop Score after cervical ripening associated with decreased cesarean birth rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2022;4(2):100534 https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100534
  33. Sheibani L, Wing DA. A safety review of medications used for labour induction. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17(2):161-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2 018.1404573
  34. Dadashaliha M, Fallah S, Mirzadeh M. Labor induction with randomized comparison of cervical, oral and intravaginal misoprostol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):721. https://doi.org/ 10.1186/s12884-021-04196-4
  35. Li XY, Guo YW, Xu YW, Zhu B, Wu XX, Chen X, et al. Clinical efficacy and safety of controlled-release dinoprostone insert: A multicenter retrospective study. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017;37(1):18-23. https://doi.org/10.3969/j. issn.1673-4254.2017.01.04
  36. Lee HH, Huang BS, Cheng M, Yeh CC, Lin IC, Horng HC, et al. Intracervical Foley catheter plus intravaginal misoprostol vs intravaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening: A meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):1825. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061825
  37. Garg R, Bagga R, Kumari A, Kalra J, Jain V, Saha SC, et al. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter combined with a single dose of vaginal misoprostol tablet or intracervical dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: A randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022;2:232-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2021.190 4227
  38. Zhao G, Song G, Liu J. Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):688. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884- 022-04988-2
  39. Coviello EM, Iqbal SN, Grantz KL, Huang CC, Landy HJ, Reddy UM. Early preterm preeclampsia outcomes by intended mode of delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(1):100.e1-100.e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.09.027
  40. Wu SW, Zhang WY. Effects of modes and timings of delivery on feto-maternal outcomes in women with severe preeclampsia: A multi-center survey in Mainland China. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:9681-7. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM. S335893
  41. Chowdhary A, Bagga R, Kalra J, Jain V, Saha SC, Kumar P. Comparison of intracervical Foley catheter used alone or combined with a single dose of dinoprostone gel for cervical ripening: A randomised study. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2019;39(4):461-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2018.1534090
  42. Jozwiak M, Bloemenkamp KW, Kelly AJ, Mol BW, Irion O, Boulvain M. Mechanical methods for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3):CD001233. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub2
  43. Orr L, Reisinger-Kindle K, Roy A, Levine L, Connolly K, Visintainer P, Schoen CN. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: A network meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(5):743.e1- 743.e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.007
  44. Bączek G, Rychlewicz S, Budner M, Kowalska I, Gałązkowski R, Teliga-Czajkowska J. Use and effects of augmentation of labor with oxytocin: A single-center, retrospective, case-control study of 4350 women in Warsaw, Poland, 2015-2020. Med Sci Monit. 2022;28:e937557. https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.937557
  45. Baranowska B, Kajdy A, Kiersnowska I, Sys D, Tataj-Puzyna U, Daly D, Rabijewski M, Bączek G, Węgrzynowska M. Oxytocin administration for induction and augmentation of labour in polish maternity units – an observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):764. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884- 021-04190-w
  46. Chen W, Xue J, Peprah MK, Wen SW, Walker M, Gao Y, Tang Y. A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing the use of Foley catheters, misoprostol, and dinoprostone for cervical ripening in the induction of labour. BJOG. 2016;123(3):346-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13456
  47. Sharkwy IAE, Noureldin EH, Mohamed EAE, Shazly SA. Sequential versus concurrent use of vaginal misoprostol plus Foley catheter for induction of labor: A randomized clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2018;68(5):408-13. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s13224-017-1059-3

Author information:


Kamilova Markhabo Yadgarovna,
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Obstetrics Department, Tajik Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
Scopus ID: 6507463534
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-2525-8273
SPIN: 2527-2877
Author ID: 867673
E-mail: marhabo1958@mail.ru

Koimdodova Badakhshon Kozidavlyatovna,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology № 2, Avicenna Tajik State Medical University
ORCID ID: 0009-0008-7137-2924
SPIN: 2989-4079
Author ID: 1139795
E-mail: bkoimdodova@mail.ru

Ishan-Khodzhaeva Farangis Rustamovna,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Senior Researcher of the Obstetrics Department, Tajik Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-9211-1124
E-mail: kachyona@mail.ru

Kiyomiddinzoda Madina,
Postgraduate Student of the Obstetrics Department, Tajik Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology
ORCID ID: 0009-0002-8921-1578
E-mail: madina9_90@mail.ru

Information about support in the form of grants, equipment, medications

The authors did not receive financial support from manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment

Conflicts of interest: No conflict

Address for correspondence:


Kamilova Markhabo Yadgarovna
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Obstetrics Department, Tajik Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology

734002, Republic of Tajikistan, Dushanbe, Tursunzade str., 31

Tel.: +992 (935) 009425

E-mail: marhabo1958@mail.ru

Materials on the topic: