Cardiovascular Surgery
doi: 10.25005/2074-0581-2024-26-2-308-313
ASSESSMENT OF LONG-TERM OUTCOMES OF BIATRIAL COX-MAZE IV CRYOABLATION IN COMBINED CARDIAC SURGERY
1I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russian Federation
2Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
3South Ural State Medical University, Chelyabinsk, Russian Federation
4First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich, Arkhangelsk, Russian Federation
Objective: To analyze the results of biatrial (BA) Cox-Maze IV cryoablation during combined heart surgeries
Methods: The study involved 88 patients who underwent BA cryoablation and concomitant cardiac surgery. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent BA cryoablation and concomitant cardiac surgery between 2019 and 2021. The types of atrial fibrillation (AF) observed were as follows: persistent – 39 (44.3%) and long-term persistent – 49 (55.7%) cases
Results: The following procedures were performed: coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 5 cases (5.7%), isolated valve repair in 67 cases (76.1%), and valve repair combined with CABG in 16 cases (18.2%). The aortic cross-clamping (ACC) time was 143 minutes [range: 120.5-161.5], and the cardiopulmonary bypass time was 193.5 minutes [range: 168.5-210]. BA Cox-Maze IV cryoablation was performed in all cases. The hospital mortality rate was 1.1%. Sinus rhythm was restored at the time of discharge in 81 patients (92%). Two patients (2.3%) received a permanent pacemaker. The survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 88.9%, 88.9%, 82.2%, and 73.5%, respectively. The rates of remaining free from AF at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 87.5%, 80.7%, 68.3%, and 38.6%, respectively.
Conclusion: Cryoablation using the maze procedure as a concomitant step during cardiac surgery is a safe procedure with a high likelihood of restoring sinus rhythm.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, correction of valve pathology, Maze procedure, sinus rhythm.
References
- Du X, Dong J, Ma C. Is atrial fibrillation a preventable disease? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(15):1968-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.020
- Li J, Gao M, Zhang M, Liu D, Li Z, Du J, Hou Y. Treatment of atrial fibrillation: A comprehensive review and practice guide. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2020;31(3):153-8. https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2019-064
- Mehaffey JH, Krebs E, Hawkins RB, Charles EJ, Tsutsui S, Kron IL, et al. Variability and utilization of concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation during mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111(1):29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. athoracsur.2020.05.125
- Weimar T, Schena S, Bailey MS, Maniar HS, Schuessler RB, Cox JL, et al. The Cox-Maze procedure for lone atrial fibrillation: A single-center experience over 2 decades. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(1):8-14. https://doi. org/10.1161/CIRCEP.111.963819
- Komarov RN, Matsuganov DA, Nuzhdin MD, Bysrtob DO, Shonbin AN. Sravnitel'naya kharakteristika krio- i radiochastotnoy ablyatsii po skheme «labirint» [Comparative characteristics of cryo- and radiofrequency ablation using the “labyrinth” technique]. Kardiologiya i serdechno-sosudistaya khirurgiya. 2024;17(1):48‑55. https://doi.org/10.17116/kardio20241701148
- Ad N, Holmes SD, Stone LE, Pritchard G, Henry L. Rhythm course over 5 years following surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(1):52-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezu059
- Henn MC, Lancaster TS, Miller JR, Sinn LA, Schuessler RB, Moon MR, et al. Late outcomes after the Cox maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(5):1168-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.102
- Khiabani AJ, MacGregor RM, Bakir NH, Manghelli JL, Sinn LA, Maniar HS, et al. The long-term outcomes and durability of the Cox-Maze IV procedure for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(2):629-41. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.100
- MacGregor RM, Bakir NH, Pedamallu H, Sinn LA, Maniar HS, Melby SJ, et al. Late results after stand-alone surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164(5):1515-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.03.109
Authors' information:
Komarov Roman Nikolaevich,
Doctor of Medical Sciences, Full Professor, Director of the Clinic of Aortic and Cardiovascular Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University; Head of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-3904-6415
SPIN: 7770-8417
Author ID: 348685
E-mail: komarov_r_n@staff.sechenov.ru
Matsuganov Denis Alekseevich,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Assistant of the Department of Anatomy and Operative Surgery, South Ural State Medical University
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-5393-7070
SPIN: 7129-0833
Author ID: 1154329
E-mail: denmacug@yandex.ru
Nuzhdin Mikhail Dmitrievich,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Head of the Cardiac Surgery Department, Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-7269-6727
SPIN: 3962-2213
Author ID: 1170320
E-mail: austesla2022@gmail.com
Bystrov Dmitriy Olegovich,
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, First City Clinical Hospital named after E.E. Volosevich
ORCID ID: 0000-0002-4909-4381
SPIN: 8033-5388
Author ID: 823039
E-mail: dr.bystrov@gmail.com
Information about support in the form of grants, equipment, medications
The authors did not receive financial support from manufacturers of medicines and medical equipment
Conflicts of interest: No conflict
Address for correspondence:
Matsuganov Denis Alekseevich
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Cardiovascular Surgeon of the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Hospital; Assistant of the Department of Anatomy and Operative Surgery, South Ural State Medical University
456501, Russian Federation, Chelyabinsk Region, Sosnovsky District, Kremenkul, MD Zelyonyy Mys, 17 Main Street
Tel.: +7 (922) 7470086
E-mail: denmacug@yandex.ru
Materials on the topic:
- “SURGICAL FORMULA” FOR CORONARY BYPASS: NEW OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMPUTER DATA PROCESSING AND PERSONALIZED ASSESSMENT OF TREATMENT RESULTS
- UNDERSTANDING OF CHRONIC VENOUS DISEASES AS A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PROBLEM: SHIFTING FROM A DISEASE-SPECIFIC, LINEAR VIEW TO A COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM PERSPECTIVE
- PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION IN A PATIENT WITH UPPER LIMB VENOUS OBSTRUCTION: A CASE REPORT
- FUNCTIONAL ACTIVITY OF ENDOTHELIUM IN THE SYSTEMIC AND LOCAL BLOOD FLOW IN PATIENTS WITH OBLITERATING ATHEROSCLEROSIS AND RESTENOSIS AFTER FEMOROPOPLITEAL BYPASS SURGERY
- COMBINED MINIMALLY INVASIVE PHLEBECTOMY WITH PRP THERAPY FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC VENOUS INSUFFICIENCY AND KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
- EPIDEMIOLOGY AND RISK FACTORS OF VARICOSE VEIN DISEASE IN TAJIKISTAN
- COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF RESULTS OF CAROTID ARTERY STENTING AND CAROTID ENDARTERECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH SURGICAL RISK
- EVALUATION OF RESULTS OF THE FIRST EXPERIENCE OF COMBINED SURGERY FOR VARICOSE VEINS AND KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
- THE ROLE OF KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF VARICOSE VEINS IN THE LOWER EXTREMITIES
- OXIDATIVE STRESS AND ANTIOXIDANT SYSTEM IN TYPE I TAKAYASU ARTERITIS